AQuick answer
Scratch-off cards typically drive 3-5× higher engagement than QR-code postcards because recipients physically interact before seeing the offer. QR codes are cheaper per piece but suffer from scan-hesitancy. Use scratch for retail offers and events; use QR when the payoff is a video or app install.
Both scratch-off cards and QR-code postcards ask the recipient to do something, but only one of them requires zero phone, zero app, and zero data-plan. Here is how they compare across the metrics that actually matter for a direct-mail campaign.
Side-by-side
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Dimension | Scratch-off cards | QR-code postcards |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement rate | 3-5× vs. plain postcard | 1-2× vs. plain postcard |
| Cost per piece (10k qty) | $0.35-$0.60 | $0.15-$0.25 |
| Requires phone | No | Yes |
| Best for | Retail offers, GOTV, fundraisers, events | Video content, app installs, long-form landing pages |
| Trust | Physical, tactile | Scan-hesitancy real (esp. 40+ demos) |
| Analytics | Redemption-code trackable | Scan-event trackable |
The verdict
Our recommendation
Verdict
Scratch-off wins for engagement, retail redemption, and older demographics. QR wins on unit cost and when the offer is a digital destination. Many campaigns use both, QR under the scratch panel, to combine tactile engagement with digital tracking.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions
Ready when you are
Let's price your scratch-off campaign
Send us the format and quantity you're comparing; we'll match it with the closest scratch-off spec and quote in one business day.